THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOS V. F. DANIELS
____________
Appeal No. 96-0001
Application No. 08/034,5321
____________
HEARD: MAY 5, 1999
____________
Before CAROFF, METZ and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 9, 10 and 12-16, all the claims remaining in the
application.
THE INVENTION
1Application for patent filed March 19, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/711,636 filed June 6, 1991, now Patent No.
5,219,618 issued June 15, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007