Ex parte DANIELS - Page 10




          Appeal No. 96-0001                                                          
          Application No. 08/034,532                                                  


          appellant reconsider the relevance of Kraus vis-à-vis the                   
          patentability of the appealed claims under both 35 U.S.C. §§                
          102 and 103.                                                                
                                      SUMMARY                                         
               The rejection of claims 9, 10 and 12-16 as being                       
          unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 from the “admitted state of              
          the prior art” considered in view of Eolkin is reversed.                    
                                      REVERSED                                        





                         MARC L.  CAROFF               )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         ANDREW H. METZ                )     APPEALS                  
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )       AND                    
                                                       )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         ADRIENE L. HANLON             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              



          AHM/gjh                                                                     

                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007