THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RUSSELL M. POTTER
____________
Appeal No. 96-0004
Application No. 08/147,7591
____________
HEARD: May 7, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-14, 16-35 and 37-43. Appellant
has withdrawn the appeal as to claims 1-14 and 16-22.
Accordingly, remaining for our consideration is the appeal of
the rejection of claims 23-35 and 37-43.
1Application for patent filed November 5, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007