Appeal No. 96-0004
Application No. 08/147,759
We also agree with appellant for the reasons set forth in
the brief at pages 4-7 that the appealed claims are based on
an adequate written description of the invention in the
originally filed specification. Accordingly, we also reverse
the stated rejection of the appealed claims under the first
paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
JOHN D. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHUNG K. PAK ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
THOMAS A. WALTZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007