THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JACOB EMERT, MALCOLM WADDOUPS
and ROBERT D. LUNDBERG
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0047
Application No. 08/047,7581
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed April 14, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/680,204 filed April 4, 1991, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/378,895 filed
July 12, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 5,118,432 issued June 12,
1992; which is a continuation of Application No. 07/095,056
filed September 9, 1987, now U.S. Patent No. 4,863,624 issued
September 5, 1989; which is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/032,066 filed March 27, 1987, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
06/754,001 filed July 11, 1985, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007