Ex parte KNAUF et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 96-0051                                         Page 9           
          Application No. 07/987,256                                                  
               Objections to the specification are not reviewed on appeal.            
          See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 706.1.                           
                                      DECISION                                        
               The obviousness-type double-patenting rejection of claims 21,          
          25, 27, 33, 34, 37, 40, 54, and 55 in view of the claims of                 
          Appellants' 07/721,761 application (now United States Patent                
          5,475,099) is affirmed.  The written description and enablement             
          rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112[1] of claims 37 and 40 is reversed.         
          The enablement rejection under section 112[1] of claims 21, 27, 33,         
          34, 37, 40, 41, 51-55, 61, and 62 is reversed.                              




























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007