Appeal No. 96-0141 Application No. 08/084,097 withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as being drawn to a nonelected invention (Brief, page 1). According to appellant, the invention is directed to a method of manufacturing an integrally molded pointer by a process comprising a sequential series of specific manipulative steps (Brief, page 2). Claim 5 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced below: 5. A process of manufacturing a pointer by molding a resin in a mold comprising an upper die having a plurality of cavities and a lower core die comprising forming a first molding space with said core die and a first cavity corresponding to a weight section of said pointer, injecting a mixture of resin material and metal powder into said first molding space, forming a second molding space with said core containing said weight section and a second cavity, and injecting the resin material into the second molding space corresponding to an indicating section of said pointer thereby integrally molding said weight section and said indicating section of said pointer. The examiner has relied upon the following references as evidence of obviousness, in addition to the admitted prior art cited by appellant on page 3 of the specification: Linne 4,269,802 May 26, 1981 Patel 4,885,121 Dec. 5, 1989 Hirota et al. (Hirota) 5,167,896 Dec. 1, 1992 Pasco 0 411 799 A1 Feb. 6, 1991 (Published European Patent Application) 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007