THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte PAUL KLOCEK
______________
Appeal No. 96-0175
Application 07/977,3881
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow
claims 1 through 27 as amended subsequent to the final rejection. Claims 28 through 33, also of2
record, stand withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b).
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we cannot
sustain the ground of rejection of claims 25 through 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,
1Application for patent filed November 17, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation-in-part of application 07/748,602, filed August 22, 1991, now abandoned.
2Amendment of March 31, 1994 (Paper No. 5).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007