THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SHIGEMITSU KIZAWA, KOJI SHINDO
and TOSHIYUKI HISATSUNE
__________
Appeal No. 96-0280
Application 08/032,2411
___________
HEARD: December 9, 1998
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH, and TORCZON, Administrative
Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-4,
all the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a surveillance camera housing
assembly. Claim 1 is illustrative and reads as follows:
1. A surveillance television camera housing assembly,
comprising:
1 Application for patent filed March 17, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007