THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN H. TREGILGAS and ARTHUR M. TURNER
____________
Appeal No. 96-0384
Application No. 08/106,2521
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before, GARRIS, KRASS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-7, 15-19 and 21. Claims 8 and 20 stand
objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but
would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including
all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening
1Application for patent filed August 13, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007