Ex parte TREGILGAS et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-0384                                         Page 2           
          Application No. 08/106,252                                                  


          claims (final rejection, page 4). Claims 9-14 and 22, which                 
          are the only other claims remaining in the application, have                
          been withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as being                  
          directed toward a non-elected invention.                                    
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to a method for                      
          formation of a semiconductor material comprising capping a                  
          mercury cadmium tellurium substrate with a tellurium rich                   
          cadmium telluride layer and annealing the capped substrate.                 
          An understanding of the invention can be derived from a                     
          reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                    
               1.   A method for establishing a metal vacancy                         
          concentration in a substrate of mercury cadmium telluride                   
          comprising the steps:                                                       
               capping the substrate with a layer of tellurium rich                   
          cadmium telluride; and,                                                     
               annealing the capped substrate at a temperature                        
          sufficient to support interdiffusion between the telluride                  
          rich cadmium telluride layer and the mercury cadmium telluride              
          substrate.                                                                  

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Jack et al. (Jack)            4,927,773                May  22,             
          1990                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007