Appeal No. 1996-0454 Application No. 08/195,374 appealed claims are separated into a first composition and a second composition respectively. Similarly, while the appellants’ claimed first composition includes a thioglycolic acid or salt thereof in admixture with an amino acid hydrochloride, the only amino acid compound disclosed by Wella is in his component two composition rather than in admixture with the thioglycolate of his component one composition. Further, the pH values of Wella’s respective compositions do not correspond to the pH values of the first and second compositions of the appealed claims. Although the examiner seems to appreciate the above mentioned distinctions, she nevertheless concludes that “one skilled in the art would be motivated to separate the components [of Wella] into pH compatible packages to obtain enhanced shelf stability” (Answer, page “3” [sic, page 4]). Thus, it seems to be the examiner’s position that an artisan with ordinary skill would have recombined the ingredients of Wella’s component one composition and component two composition in such a manner as to result in a first composition and a second composition having the here claimed 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007