Appeal No. 1996-0454
Application No. 08/195,374
teaching, suggestion or incentive derived from the applied
prior art. W.L. Gore & Assoc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d
1540, 1553, 220 USPQ 303, 312-313 (Fed. Cir. 1983). As a
consequence, we cannot sustain the examiner’s § 103 rejection
of claims 1 and 3 through 21 as being unpatentable over Wella
in view of Yoshioka or Kolc.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007