THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL CICCOLLELLA and PAUL A. MATULA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0456
Application No. 08/072,6541
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, PATE, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 12
through 17, 21 and 24 through 27. Claims 23 and 28 were
cancelled subsequent to final rejection. These are the only
claims in the application.
1Application for patent filed June 3, 1993. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/565,626, filed August 10, 1990; now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007