THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CLARENCE D. CHANG, SCOTT HAN,
ROGER A. MORRISON and JOSE G. SANTIESTEBAN
_____________
Appeal 96-0460
Application 08/150,3031
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Application for patent filed 12 November 1993. The application on appeal is said1
to be a continuation-in-part of application 08/095,884, filed 22 July 1993. Another
application (08/679,238), said to be a continuation of application 08/095,884, issued on
17 February 1998 as U.S. Patent 5,719,097. The real party in interest would appear to
be either Mobil Research and Development Corporation or Mobil Oil Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007