THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SHIU-CHUNG JON, RAMA RAMAGOPAL
and MYRON D. NICHOLSON
__________
Appeal No. 96-0479
Application 08/124,0631
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1-10, 12, 14-16 and 18-34. As for the other claims remaining in the application, claims 11, 13 and 17
stand withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to non-elected species and claims 35-75 stand
Application for patent filed September 21, 1993.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007