Appeal No. 96-0479 Application 08/124,063 Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1-10, 12, 14-16, 18-21 and 25-34 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hettiarachchy in view of Winkler and Remer is reversed. We also reverse the rejection of claims 22-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hettiarachchy in view of Winkler and Remer further in view of Tood since Tood does not make up for the deficiencies of Hettiarachchy, Winkler and Remer. For the foregoing reasons, the examiner’s rejection of claims on appeal is reversed. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CAMERON WEIFFENBACH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) CHARLES F. WARREN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007