THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte CREG W. DANCE and STEVEN L. OLSON __________ Appeal No. 96-0570 Application 08/101,989 __________ REHEARING __________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This case comes before us again on request for rehearing of our decision of February 12, 1998, wherein we affirmed-in- part the examiner’s decision and added a new ground of rejection. Five points were raised by the appellants. In 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007