Appeal No. 96-0570 Application No. 08/101,989 particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicants regard as their invention. See Sjolund v. Musland, 847 F.2d 1573, 1581, 6 USPQ2d 2020, 2027 (Fed. Cir. 1988). Since the infusion zone clearly has a length and a diameter, it is incumbent upon the appellants to particularly point out which of the two dimensions is limited by the claim. SUMMARY The Request for Rehearing is granted to the extent that we have reviewed our decision in the light of the arguments set forth in the request, but it is denied insofar as altering our decision is concerned. DENIED Neal E. Abrams ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) Lawrence J. Staab ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007