Appeal No. 96-0607
Application No. 08/134,778
Barnett. Accordingly, we cannot sustain the examiner’s8
rejection of claims 14, 16, 30 and 32.
SUMMARY
The rejection of claims 8-13, 15, 24-29 and 31 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Daniel or Roncari in view
of Barnett or Bowman further in view of Chmelir, Smith ‘224,
Smith ‘359, or Moradi-Araghi is affirmed. The rejection of
claims 14, 16, 30 and 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over these same
references is reversed. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision
to reject the appealed claims is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
8Similarly, there is no suggestion in the record for
combining the teachings of Chmelir, Smith ‘224, Smith ‘359,
and Moradi-Araghi with Roncari (a carrier for immunological
reagents) or Bowman (a coating for photographic paper).
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007