Paper No. 25
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MASANOBU IWASAKI
and KATSUHIRO TSUKAMOTO
______________
Appeal No. 96-0633
Application 07/971,0411
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and KRASS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 to 15 and 19 to 23. Claims 16
through 18 and 24 through 27 relate to a nonelected invention
made subject to a restriction requirement.
Application for patent filed November 3, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007