Appeal No. 96-0654
Application 08/103,207
1987
Tanimoto 5,048,926 Sep. 17,
1991
Kizu et al. (Kizu) 5,282,060 Jan. 25,
1994
Claims 1 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Takagi. The following is a new
ground of rejection which was made in the Examiner's answer.
The specification stands objected to under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, for failing to provide an adequate written
description of the invention. Claims 1, 5, 6, 9, 11 and 12
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for the
reason set forth in the objection to the specification.
Claims 1, 5, 6, 9, 11,
12 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Takagi in view of Hirahara. Claims 1, 5, 6,
9, 11, 12 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Takagi in view of Toriumi. Claim 3
stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Takagi in view of Tanimoto. Claim 4 stands rejected
under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Takagi in view of Kizu.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007