THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TAKASHI SHIBANUMA, TAKASHI KANEMURA
and SATOSHI KOYAMA
________________
Appeal No. 1996-0684
Application No. 08/116,5501
________________
HEARD: November 18, 1999
________________
Before WINTERS, ROBINSON and LORIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision
rejecting claims 1 through 3, 5 through 8, and 10. Claim 11,
1Application for patent filed September 7, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/886,823, filed May 22, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007