Appeal No. 1996-0708 Page 7
Application No. 08/241,888
examiner is advised to compare other claimed features with the
disclosure of Miyashita to determine whether Miyashita also
affects the patentability of the remaining claims in the
present application.
In view of the foregoing, we reverse the examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 1-30 over the combined teachings of
Touval, Breitenfellner and Sandler and remand the application
to the
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007