THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HITOSHI KAMAMORI, KOJI IWAS, TAKAKAZU FUKUCHI,
MITSURU SUGINOYA, TSUTOMU WATANABE and TOSHIAKI OTA
____________
Appeal No. 96-0763
Application No. 07/840,3451
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, OWENS, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 6, 7, 9 through 11 and 14
through 16, as amended under 37 CFR § 1.116 after the final
rejection. See the amendments filed May 11, 1994 (paper no.
1Application for patent filed February 24, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007