THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 9 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DENNIS W. JOHNSON and PERVAJE A. BHAT ____________ Appeal No. 96-0797 Application No. 08/089,9621 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 11, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. 1Application for patent filed July 12, 1993.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007