Paper No. 35 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte YASUSHI FUJINAMI and JUN YONEMITSU ______________ Appeal No. 96-0809 Application 08/197,6771 _______________ HEARD: FEBRUARY 11, 1999 _______________ Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-13 and 15, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application. 1Application for patent filed February 17, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/921,122, filed July 29, 1992. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007