Ex parte FUJINAMI et al. - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 35                   
               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                              Ex parte YASUSHI FUJINAMI                               
                                  and JUN YONEMITSU                                   
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 96-0809                                   
                              Application 08/197,6771                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                              HEARD: FEBRUARY 11, 1999                                
                                   _______________                                    
          Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and LALL, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-13 and 15, which                  
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.                     

               1Application for patent filed February 17, 1994.  According to         
          appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/921,122,   
          filed July 29, 1992.                                                        
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007