Appeal No. 96-0809 Application 08/197,677 Miller 4,425,586 Jan. 10, 1984 Maruta et al. (Maruta) 5,056,075 Oct. 08, 1991 Ando 5,124,963 June 23, 1992 The following rejections are before us on appeal: 1. Claims 1-3, 5/1, 5/2, 5/3, 6-13 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by the disclosure of Miller. 2. Claims 1, 3, 4, 5/1, 5/3, 5/4, 6-8, 10, 11, 13 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by the disclosure of Ando. 3. Claims 1-5 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by the disclosure of Ando or alternatively under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the teachings of Ando. 4. Claims 2, 5/2, 9 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the teachings of Ando and Maruta. Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007