THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MASATOSHI HIKOSAKA
and HIROYUKI MUTOU
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0852
Application 08/116,5811
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 9, 14 and 16, and from
the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 1, 7, 8, 12 and 15 as amended subsequent to the final
1Application for patent filed September 7, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/832,915, filed February 10, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007