Ex parte HIKOSAKA et al. - Page 2




               Appeal No. 96-0852                                                                                                 
               Application 08/116,581                                                                                             


               rejection in papers filed on October 7, 1994 (Paper No. 18) and June 1, 1995 (Paper No. 25). Claims                

               2 through 6, 10, 11 and 13 have been canceled.                                                                     



                      Appellants’ invention relates to a process gas chromatographic system. Independent claims 1                 

               and 9 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and a substantially correct copy of those                 

               claims may be found in the Appendix to appellants’ brief. Claim 1, as seen in the Appendix, was                    

               amended by Paper No. 25, filed June 1, 1995, to change “inlet” (second occurrence) in line 62 thereof              

               to -- vent --.                                                                                                     



                      The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims             

               are:                                                                                                               



               Claudy                                3,069,894                      Dec. 25, 1962                                 
               Tinklepaugh et al. (Tinklepaugh)              3,910,765                     Oct.   7, 1975                         


               Lamazou et al. (Lamazou)                      430,278                       Feb. 15, 1967                          
               (Swiss Patent Application)                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                 



                      In addition to the foregoing references, the examiner has also relied upon Admitted Prior Art               


                                                                2                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007