Ex parte BOND et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-0864                                                        
          Application No. 08/181,695                                                  


               1.  A method for oxidizing organic material in an aqueous              
          stream containing one or more inorganic salts, inorganic salt               
          precursors or mixtures thereof substantially insoluble in the               
          aqueous stream under supercritical conditions near the                      
          critical point comprising oxidizing said organic material in                
          the presence of an oxidant in a reactor at a temperature at                 
          least equal to the critical temperature of the aqueous stream               
          so as to form a single homogeneous fluid phase and at a                     
          pressure sufficiently high to solubilize said inorganic salts               
          in said single homogeneous phase.                                           
               The examiner has relied upon the following reference as                
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Modell                        4,543,190          Sep. 24, 1985              
               This merits panel of the Board cites and discusses the                 
          following reference:                                                        
          McHugh et al. (McHugh), Supercritical Fluid Extraction, pp. 1-              
          7, Butterworth Publishers, 1986 (a copy is attached to this                 
          decision).                                                                  
               Claims 1-19 and 21-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103 as unpatentable over Modell (Answer, page 3, citing the                 
          final rejection in Paper No. 9).  We reverse this rejection                 
          for essentially the reasons set forth in appellants’ Brief and              
          Reply Brief.  We add the following comments for emphasis and                
          completeness.                                                               
          OPINION                                                                     




                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007