THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS J. HARTRANFT and
CHARLES J. DUBAUSKAS
____________
Appeal No. 96-0881
Application No. 07/795,9081
____________
HEARD: March 2, 1998
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS, and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-26. Claim 1 and 14 are
representative and are reproduced below:
1. A method of mixing dialysate in a hemodialysis machine,
comprising:
1Application for patent filed November 15, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007