THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DONALD J. GOODMAN,
RAYMOND E. KEROLLIS,
ALBERT B. MINDLER
and BRUCE BRUNS
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0920
Application 08/186,3431
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, OWENS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of claims 2 through 8 and 12 through 20, which are all
of the claims remaining in the application. 2
1Application for patent filed January 25, 1994.
2The Notice of Appeal, dated February 13, 1995, paper No. 8, included claims 2 through 10,
and 12 through 21. The Answer, stated that upon reconsideration, claims 9, 10, and 21 were
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007