Ex parte KHOUW et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-0936                                                          
          Application 08/230,173                                                      


          withdrawn from consideration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b).                 
          We reverse.                                                                 


               The subject matter on appeal relates to an "apparatus for              
          introducing a stream of fluid into a fluid mass to rapidly                  
          attain uniform radial fluid distribution" (specification, page              
          1).  Claim 8 is representative and reads as follows:                        
               8.   An apparatus for radial distribution of fluid into a              
          fluid mass contained in a vessel comprising (a) a vessel                    
          containing a fluid mass; (b) disposed within said vessel and                
          within said fluid mass, a centrally disposed fluid riser inlet              
          conduit extending through a wall or floor of said vessel and                
          oriented substantially vertically along the fluid riser inlet               
          conduit's longitudinal axis, said riser inlet conduit having a              
          plurality of fluid conveying arms each of said arms having an               
          end remote from said fluid riser inlet conduit, and each of                 
          said arms extending radially and substantially horizontally                 
          outward from the vertical axis of said fluid riser inlet                    
          conduit and extending radially into the fluid mass wherein the              
          arms have an enclosed length and (c) having along said                      
          enclosed length one or more outlet openings at or near the end              
          remote from the fluid riser inlet conduit.                                  
               The reference relied upon by the examiner as evidence of               
          obviousness is:                                                             
          Castagnos, Jr. (Castagnos)    4,664,888           May 12, 1987              
               Claims 8 and 10 through 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              




                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007