THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MAX A. WEAVER,
EDWARD W. KLUGER
and DAVID J. MOODY
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0971
Application 07/888,2681
______________
HEARD: JUNE 9, 1999
_______________
Before WARREN, OWENS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 39 through 46 and 48
through 54, dated January 17, 1995. An amendment under 37 C.F.R. § 1.116 after the final rejection2
1Application for patent filed May 22, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/578,107, filed September 5, 1990.
2Claim 47 had previously been canceled in an amendment dated January 24, 1994, but was
erroneously included in the final rejection and in appellants Notice of Appeal dated April 17, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007