THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MIZUO SOEDA, AKIMASA ARITA and TAKEO ITO
____________
Appeal No. 96-1178
Application No. 08/160,3241
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 and 2 which are all of the claims
pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed December 2, 1993.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/941,124, filed October 30, 1992, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007