THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHINPEI IKENOUE and TAKAAKI TERASHITA
____________
Appeal No. 96-1184
Application No. 08/128,5681
____________
HEARD: August 3, 1999
____________
Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 20 and 22 through 36. Claim 21
has been canceled. Claim 37 has been allowed.
Application for patent filed September 29, 1993. According to1
appellants, this application is a continuation of Serial No. 07/753,770, filed
September 3, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007