Appeal No. 96-1184 Application No. 08/128,568 Thus, Robison suggests recording the photographic data using a particular format, or organization, based on tracks of the magnetic film. Further, Robison discloses (column 4, lines 1-44): Each block of data is appended to a virtual identification code whose meaning is defined in a look-up table accessable [sic] to the system. Instructions contained in the look-up table for a given virtual identification code provide the byte location of and encoding (recording) or decoding (playback) algorithm for several related parameters recorded within the data block bearing that identification code. Any one of three types of virtual identification codes are employed, depending upon the type of related data recorded in the block . . . . In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the various types of information are allocated among the dedicated tracks in accordance with groups of related information types or parameters, some individual groups being used by more than one stage of the film use cycle. Furthermore, in this preferred embodiment, information common to all frames of the film is in dedicated tracks on the film leader. Specifically, information such as film type, camera type, owner identification, a directory of written information and the like are recorded in a first camera track . . . designated track CO while the film leader is designated frame O. Scene related parameters automatically sensed by the camera (such as scene luminance, camera orientation, color temperature, flash fire, etc.) are recorded in track CO in each subsequent frame (e.g. frames 1- 25). . . . Clearly, an intelligent photofinishing classifier station, in attempting to compute the optimum exposure conditions to make a print, would 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007