THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEA BARDEEN
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1291
Application No. 08/182,4091
____________
HEARD: November 4, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6-13, 15, 17, 20, 21 and 32.
Claims 16 and 22 through 31 stand withdrawn from consideration
by the examiner as drawn to a non-elected invention.
1Application for patent filed January 14, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007