Ex parte SMITH et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-1320                                                          
          Application 08/081,744                                                      


          to an elevated temperature said defects being caused by                     
          emanating subsurface gases, said process comprising:                        
               first heating said molded thermoset fiber reinforced                   
          plastic part, said part having one or more machined surfaces                
          formed by cutting or abrading, to a temperature of from about               
          120EF (49EC) to 400EF (204EC),                                              
               then applying a coating of a liquid epoxy composition to               
          one or more the machined surfaces of said part, wherein said                
          liquid epoxy composition has a Brookfield viscosity at 25EC of              
          less than 4,000 poise,                                                      
               and thereafter allowing said liquid epoxy composition to               
          cure into a thermoset coating,                                              
               wherein said liquid epoxy composition comprises at least               
          one oligomer having two or more reactive epoxy end groups and               
          a hardener component reactive with said epoxy end groups, and               
          wherein said defects are paint pops and paint craters in                    
          subsequently applied surface coatings.                                      
                                  THE REFERENCES                                     
          Smock et al. (Smock)            4,024,304          May  17,                 
          1977 Holmes et al. (Holmes)          4,235,952          Nov.                
          25, 1980                                                                    
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1, 2, 5-9 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Holmes taken with Smock.                   
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully considered all of the arguments                      


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007