THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ANTHONY C. LOWE and CHRISTOPHER C. PIETRZAK ____________ Appeal No. 96-1472 Application No. 08/287,0701 ____________ HEARD: May 4, 1999 ____________ Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and HECKER, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1Application for patent filed August 8, 1994. According to appellants, the application is a continuation of Application No. 08/085,512, filed June 30, 1993, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007