Appeal No. 96-1472 Application No. 08/287,070 a shutter disposed to interrupt a portion of said light, said shutter comprising an array of shutter elements, each element having a unique address, further wherein each element has a transparent state in which light from said light source is transmitted and an opaque state in which light from said light source is blocked; and shutter drive circuit means coupled to said shutter elements for controlling the state of each of said shutter elements so as to provide a scanning light beam as an output of said shutter. The references relied on by the examiner are: Cooreman 3,613,066 Oct. 12, 1971 Okisu et al. (Okisu) 5,159,187 Oct. 27, 1992 Claims 1 through 10, 12 and 15 through 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cooreman in view of Okisu. Reference is made to the briefs and the answer for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner. OPINION The obviousness rejection is reversed. Cooreman discloses an input device in which the surface of table 1 is scanned with two monochromatic light beams produced by a laser light source 3. The two light beams are "very thin and of practically negligible divergency" (column 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007