Appeal No. 96-1502 Application 08/169,107 The appeal is from a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 1-16. We reverse-in-part and vacate and remand in-part. The examiner has entered two rejections. I. Claims 1-16 have been rejected as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Michaelson, U.S. Patent 3,755,147 (1973). Upon consideration of the brief on appeal and the examiner's answer, it is ORDERED that the rejection is reversed essentially for the reasons given in Section A and Section B, Parts 1 and 2 of our opinion in Ex parte Chang, Appeal 96-0460 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. Feb. 3, 1999) (Paper 22) (copy attached). II. Claims 1-16 have been rejected for obviousness type double patenting in view of the claims in the application involved in Appeal 96-0460. The rejection is vacated and the application is remanded to the examiner for further proceedings. - 2 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007