Appeal No. 96-1502
Application 08/169,107
The appeal is from a decision of the Primary Examiner
rejecting claims 1-16. We reverse-in-part and vacate and
remand in-part.
The examiner has entered two rejections.
I.
Claims 1-16 have been rejected as being unpatentable
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Michaelson, U.S. Patent 3,755,147
(1973).
Upon consideration of the brief on appeal and the
examiner's answer, it is
ORDERED that the rejection is reversed essentially
for the reasons given in Section A and Section B, Parts 1 and
2 of our opinion in Ex parte Chang, Appeal 96-0460 (Bd. Pat.
App. & Int. Feb. 3, 1999) (Paper 22) (copy attached).
II.
Claims 1-16 have been rejected for obviousness type
double patenting in view of the claims in the application
involved in Appeal 96-0460.
The rejection is vacated and the application is remanded
to the examiner for further proceedings.
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007