THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LARS ASKMAN and WERNER LEONHARDT
__________
Appeal No. 96-1548
Application 08/288,1271
___________
HEARD: June 10, 1999
___________
Before PAK, WALTZ and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 11 through 24 as amended
subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated
July 31, 1995, Paper No. 11, entered as per the Advisory
Action dated Aug. 8, 1995, Paper No. 12). Claims 11 through
24 are the only claims remaining in this application.
1 Application for patent filed August 10, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007