THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SOLOMON ZAROMB
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1556
Application No. 08/154,1351
____________
HEARD: December 9, 1999
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1, 3 through 10, 12, 15 through 17 and
21 through 23. Claim 1, 10, 16 and 17 were amended subsequent
to the final Office action dated May 22, 1995, Paper No. 11.
1Application for patent filed November 18, 1993.
According to appellant, the application is a division of
Application No. 07/648,649, filed January 31, 1991, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007