THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte OLE K. NILSSEN
____________
Appeal No. 96-1582
Application No. 08/292,9281
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and KRASS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed August 18, 1994.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/912,261 filed July 13, 1992, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/901,989
filed June 22, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,469,028 issued
November 21, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007