Appeal No. 96-1582 Application No. 08/292,928 means connected in circuit with the ballast output terminals as well as with the second pair of DC terminals. The examiner relies on the following reference: Stupp et al. (Stupp) 4,560,908 Dec. 24, 1985 Claims 1 through 40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Stupp. Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective positions of appellant and the examiner. OPINION We will sustain the rejection of claims 8, 15, 34 through 36 and 38 through 40 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 but we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 14, 16 through 33 and 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The examiner applies Stupp against all of the pending claims. Stupp is directed, as is the instant invention, to a high-frequency ballast for discharge lamps. Also, like the instant claimed invention, Stupp discloses a power line which provides a substantially sinusoidal AC power line voltage and 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007