THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte OLE K. NILSSEN
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1664
Application No. 08/272,6471
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed July 11, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/820,918, filed January 15, 1992, now
abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
07/281,275, filed December 7, 1988, now abandoned, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/080,865, filed
August 3, 1987, now U.S. Patent No. 4,819,146, issued April 4,
1989.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007