THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte H. WARD CONRU,
and STEPHEN G. STARR
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1705
Application 08/296,2691
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed August 25, 1994. According
to the appellants, this application is a continuation of
07/951,292, filed September 09, 1992, now abandoned, which is
a continuation 07/625,410, filed December 11, 1990, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of 07/493,654, filed March
15, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007