THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VIRGINIA C. MARHEVKA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1716
Application No. 08/344,5321
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 7. The
remaining claims in this application are claims 5, 6 and 8
1Application for patent filed November 23, 1994.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/082,609, filed June 24, 1993, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007